Getting individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA) to walk regularly is a crucial component in reducing knee pain, improving physical function, and staving off comorbidities such as cardiovascular disease. But how can a clinician know if a patient is capable of meeting minimum walking recommendations? Authors of a recent study believe it may come down to performance on 3 simple tests.
In a study of 1,925 participants with or at risk for knee OA, researchers sought to link performance on the 5 times sit-to-stand test, the 20-meter walk test, and the 400-meter walk test to walking patterns outside the clinic. Participants ranged in age from 56 to 74 years, with an average age of 65. The study was e-published ahead of print in Arthritis Care and Research(abstract only available for free).
Participants were given accelerometers and instructed to wear the devices during waking hours for 7 consecutive days. Participants’ accelerometer data were later reviewed and compared with their performance on the 3 tests. Researchers divided participants into 2 groups—those who averaged 6,000 or more steps a day and those who averaged fewer than 6,000 steps. Here’s what they found:
The bottom line, according to researchers: taking longer than 12 seconds to complete the sit-to-stand test, walking slower than 1.22 meters per second during the 20-meter walk test, or taking longer than 5.22 minutes to walk 400 meters are reliable indicators that an individual with knee OA may not have sufficient physical function to reach the 6,000 steps-per-day walking goal.
That, authors believe, is where the role of the physical therapist could make a big difference.
“One possible implication of our study is [that] referral to rehabilitation, such as physical therapy, may be of benefit to those with or at risk of knee OA not meeting 1 or more of these physical function thresholds,” authors write. “[Common] interventions that are employed by physical therapists are effective to improve physical function in people with knee OA.”
Authors of the study include APTA members Hiral Master, PT, MPH; Louise Thoma, PT, DPT; Meredith Christiansen, PT, DPT; Emily Polakowski, MS, SPT; Laura Schmitt, PT, DPT; and Daniel White, PT, ScD, MSc.
Research-related stories featured in PT in Motion News are intended to highlight a topic of interest only and do not constitute an endorsement by APTA. For synthesized research and evidence-based practice information, visit the association’s PTNow website.